Legal Opinion

United States v. Hugo Stinnes Steel & Metals Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 7, 1979No. 78-16PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment of the Customs Court, 80 Cust. Ct. 175, C.D. 4753, 453 F. Supp. 94 (1978), granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment and denying appellant’s cross-motion, holding that the merchandise in question, 415 coils of cold-rolled steel sheets, was “exported to the United States before 12:01 a.m., August 16, 1971,” and is accordingly exempt from the 10-percent supplemental duty provided by Presidential Proclamation 4074 within the intent of additional duty order No. 3. We affirm.

Presidential Action

The economic crisis of 1971 that spawned the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Yoshida International, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  2. Michelin Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. Czarnikow-Rionda Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Michelin Tire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  5. Hugo Stinnes Steel & Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  2. Westway Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. Westway Trading Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API