Legal Opinion
Cerro De Pasco Copper Corp. v. Knut Knutsen, O. A. S.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 9, 1951No. 175, Docket 21904PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
Clause 12 of the bill of lading provides: “Any claim under this Bill of Lading including claims for alleged unseaworthiness * * * to be settled with the Company in Norway, according to Norwegian law to the exclusion of proceedings in the Courts of any other Country. Any dispute regarding the interpretation of the rules of this Bill of Lading is to be decided in Norway according to Norwegian Law which is in every respect governing * * * The bill was issued in Peru and (this we regard as important) was there signed on behalf of libellant. It is undisputed that such a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mittenthal v. MascagniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Kind v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
3Cited by42 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Wm. H. Muller & Co., Inc. v. Swedish American Line Ltd. And Transatlantic Steamship Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Indussa Corporation v. S.S. Ranborg, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc. (Erling Hansens Rederi A/s and Skibs A/s Linea, Claimants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Gaskin v. Stumm Handel GmbHDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.