Legal Opinion

B. F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction Company v. The Motor Vessel Fernside, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Glittre

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1958No. 16917_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is not the normal collision case with loyal and earnest adherents swearing contradictorily. A simple case coming up on a small record, with no material facts in dispute, it presents the picture of an overtaking vessel, the Motor Vessel Fernside, coming up in a narrow channel dead astern of, and running into’ and ramming, libellant’s tug and tow.

The libel, in addition to the usual formal averments and an allegation that the Tug-tow was overtaken and rammed from astern by the Vessel, charges the Vessel with negligence, in each particular as follows:

“14. (a) In that the Fernside failed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles Warner Co. v. Independent Pier Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Seaboard Airline R. Co. v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. The Pan MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. The Tug Percheron, Her Engines, Furniture, Apparel, Etc., and Cornelius Kroll & Company v. Alabama Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ohio River Company v. Continental Grain CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  2. Bockenheim Unterweser Reedereibeteiligungs Schiffahrtsges v. M/V VoyagerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. M/V WartenfelsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. California Transport Corp. v. Tug AccentorDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960
  5. Elmini Lama, Inc. v. The Tug Natalie EymardDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API