B. F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction Company v. The Motor Vessel Fernside, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s Glittre
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is not the normal collision case with loyal and earnest adherents swearing contradictorily. A simple case coming up on a small record, with no material facts in dispute, it presents the picture of an overtaking vessel, the Motor Vessel Fernside, coming up in a narrow channel dead astern of, and running into’ and ramming, libellant’s tug and tow.
The libel, in addition to the usual formal averments and an allegation that the Tug-tow was overtaken and rammed from astern by the Vessel, charges the Vessel with negligence, in each particular as follows:
“14. (a) In that the Fernside failed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Charles Warner Co. v. Independent Pier Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Seaboard Airline R. Co. v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. The Pan MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- The Tug Percheron, Her Engines, Furniture, Apparel, Etc., and Cornelius Kroll & Company v. Alabama Transit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ohio River Company v. Continental Grain CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Bockenheim Unterweser Reedereibeteiligungs Schiffahrtsges v. M/V VoyagerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
- Sun Oil Co. v. M/V WartenfelsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- California Transport Corp. v. Tug AccentorDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1960
- Elmini Lama, Inc. v. The Tug Natalie EymardDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.