Legal Opinion
Bockenheim Unterweser Reedereibeteiligungs Schiffahrtsges v. M/V Voyager
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 11, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-1488PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASSIBRY, District Judge:
This litigation involves a collision between the Russian Motorship KHUDO-ZHNIK A. GERASIMOV (hereafter “KHUDOZHNIK”) and the German Motorship BOCKENHEIM, in the Mississippi River near 48 Mile Point (MAHP 142.3). The colliding vessels sued each other for their damages and both colliding vessels asserted claims against the M/V VOYAGER on the ground that the M/V VOYAGER had embarrassed the navigation of the M/S BOCKENHEIM and caused the collision. Prior to trial the M/S KHUDOZHNIK settled her claims with the M/S BOCKENHEIM and dismissed her suit against the M/S…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The M. J. RudolphCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Whitridge v. DillSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- B. F. Diamond, Trading as Diamond Construction Company v. The Motor Vessel Fernside, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and A/s GlittreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Liner v. Crewboat Mr. LuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Otal Investments Ltd. v. M v. ClaryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Slobodna Plovidba v. KingDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
- Elmini Lama, Inc. v. The Tug Natalie EymardDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1983
- Otal Investments Ltd. v. M v. ClaryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Otal Investments, Ltd. v. M v. ClaryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007