Legal Opinion

Armendarez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1992No. 2-90-312-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

Christopher Armendarez appeals his conviction of the offense of illegal investment, TEX.HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.126(a)(2) (Vernon Pamph.1991), complaining in two points of error: (1) the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to suppress based on the outrageous conduct of the police; and (2) the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to suppress based upon the illegal conduct of the police. We overrule both points and affirm the judgment of the trial court because the conduct of the police in conducting a “reverse sting” operation was not so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Beck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  3. Satterwhite v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liggins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  2. Land v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
  3. State v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API