Legal Opinion

State v. Tyson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1996No. 11-95-335-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DICKENSON, Justice.

The trial court granted a motion to suppress evidence which was filed by defendant-appellee, Todd Newman Tyson, under TEX. CODE CRIM.PROANN. art. 38.23 (Vernon Supp.1996). The State appeals the trial court’s order pursuant to TEX.CODE CRIM. PRO ANN. art. 44.01 (Vernon Supp.1996). We reverse and remand.

Tyson was charged by information with the misdemeanor offense of selling an alcoholic beverage to a minor on or about August 19, 1994. The minor was working with agents of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission in a “sting operation.” The question is whether Tyson has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  3. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  4. Satterwhite v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  5. Armendarez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. David Robert Sandoval v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  2. David Robert Sandoval v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  3. David Robert Sandoval v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
  4. Dustin Ryan Rhoades v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
  5. Frank Dwight Carter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API