Legal Opinion

Satterwhite v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 5, 1985No. 13-84-431-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

A jury assessed a punishment of twelve years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections after convicting appellant for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance to a minor. See TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 4476-15 § 4.053 (Vernon Supp.1985).

Appellant argues in his first ground of error that marijuana is not a controlled substance. This argument is without merit. Marijuana is a Schedule 1 controlled substance. TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 4476-15 § 2.03(a) & (d)(13) (Vernon Supp.1985). Whitaker v. State, 572 S.W.2d 956, 957 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). The trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Redman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Canada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Robert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Whitaker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Liggins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  3. Beck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  4. Land v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
  5. State v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API