Satterwhite v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENAVIDES, Justice.
A jury assessed a punishment of twelve years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections after convicting appellant for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance to a minor. See TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 4476-15 § 4.053 (Vernon Supp.1985).
Appellant argues in his first ground of error that marijuana is not a controlled substance. This argument is without merit. Marijuana is a Schedule 1 controlled substance. TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 4476-15 § 2.03(a) & (d)(13) (Vernon Supp.1985). Whitaker v. State, 572 S.W.2d 956, 957 (Tex.Crim.App.1978). The trial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Redman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Canada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Robert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Whitaker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hubbard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Liggins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
- Beck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Land v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1994
- State v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.