Legal Opinion
Mardi Gras of San Luis Obispo v. City of San Luis Obispo
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 11, 2002No. CV 02-323 ABC (BQRX)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
COLLINS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs application for a preliminary injunction (the “Application”) came on regularly for hearing before this Court on February 5, 2002. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the ease file, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs application is GRANTED.
I. Background
Mardi Gras of San Luis Obispo (“MGSLO”) claims that since 1978, it has sponsored a parade in the City of San Luis Obispo (the “City”) to celebrate “Fat Tuesday,” a religious holiday marking the beginning…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Khademi v. South Orange County Community College DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Horizon Outdoor v. City of Industry, CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Napa Valley Publishing Co. v. City of CalistogaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.