Legal Opinion
Horizon Outdoor v. City of Industry, California
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 21, 2002No. CV023465ABCPLAXPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION ON DEFENDANT’S SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS; PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
COLLINS, District Judge.
This case involves a First Amendment challenge to Defendant City of Industry’s (“Defendant’s” or the “City’s”) ordinance regulating advertising displays and other outdoor signs. Pending before the Court are (1) the Motion in Response to Defendant’s Suggestion of Mootness (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiffs Horizon Outdoor, LLC (“Horizon”) and Adam Sussman (“Sussman,” and together with Horizon, “Plaintiffs”) and (2) Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Covenant Media of California, L.LC. v. City of Huntington ParkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- GET OUTDOORS II, LLC v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of BeaumontDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.