Legal Opinion

Ho-Chunk Nation v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 1, 2008No. 2007AP1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. This appeal concerns the Ho-Chunk Nation's claim for a refund of cigarette taxes under Wis. Stat. § 139.323 (2005-06) 1 in respect to sales on the DeJope property. The Tax Appeals Commission denied the claim because it concluded the DeJope property was not "designated . .. trust land on or before January 1, 1983" as required by the statute. See § 139.323(3). The circuit court affirmed and the Ho-Chunk Nation appeals.

¶ 2. We agree with the commission and the circuit court that the statutory phrase means that the United States government must hold the land in trust on or before January 1,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ho-Chunk Nation v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ho-Chunk Nation v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Ho-Chunk Nation v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API