Legal Opinion

Ho-Chunk Nation v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2009No. 2007AP1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This review of a published court of appeals decision1 involves the Ho-Chunk Nation's appeal of a denied claim for a tax *557refund under Wis. Stat. § 139.323(3) (2005-06).2 The statute authorizes partial refunds for cigarette taxes provided the tax was collected on sales made on land that "was designated a reservation or trust land on or before January 1, 1983." At issue is whether the land on which the relevant sales took place satisfies that portion of the statute. The land was approved for purchase in August 1982 and formally accepted by the United States government on January 31, 1983.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. DionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Menasha Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Ash Grove Cement Co. v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Xerox Corp. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  4. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company v. The Quarters Condominium Owners Association, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
  5. Gral v. Estate of Margolis (In re Gral)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API