Corcoran v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
A jury found the defendant, Joseph E. Corcoran, guilty of four counts of murder.1 In the subsequent penalty phase, the jury recommended the death penalty, and the trial court ordered the death sentence imposed. Appealing from the trial court judgment, the defendant does not challenge the guilt phase proceedings or his resulting convictions. His appellate claims concern only the penalty and sentencing proceedings and his death sentence.2 The defendant’s appeal presents eight claims, which we rearrange as follows: (1) the Indiana death penalty statute violates the United States…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arave v. CreechSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wilson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Randy L. Knapp v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Kevin Charles Isom v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Pavey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.