Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Niesen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2011No. 2011AP47-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review, pursuant to SCR 22.17(2),1 a referee's report and recommendation concluding that Attorney Ronald K. Niesen engaged in professional misconduct and recommending that his license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended, that he pay restitution to an injured client, and that he pay the costs of this proceeding.2 We conclude Attorney Niesen's ethical violations warrant a nine-month suspension of his license to practice law in this state. In addition, we order Attorney Niesen to pay restitution and costs as set forth herein.

¶ 2. Attorney Niesen was admitted to practice law in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against BerlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Disciplinary Proceedings Against Cavendish-SosinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API