Legal Opinion

State v. Crane

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 2009No. A08-0377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Before his trial for third-degree driving while impaired (DWI), Kenneth William Crane moved the district court to order the prosecution to disclose the computer source code for the Intoxilyzer breath-test machine. The district court denied that motion on the basis that the state did not possess or control the source code, and a jury found Crane guilty on two counts of third-degree DWI. On appeal, Crane argues that the district court erred in its discovery ruling. We conclude that the district court’s ruling was erroneous under the supreme court’s recent ruling in State…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. McArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API