State v. Crane
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Before his trial for third-degree driving while impaired (DWI), Kenneth William Crane moved the district court to order the prosecution to disclose the computer source code for the Intoxilyzer breath-test machine. The district court denied that motion on the basis that the state did not possess or control the source code, and a jury found Crane guilty on two counts of third-degree DWI. On appeal, Crane argues that the district court erred in its discovery ruling. We conclude that the district court’s ruling was erroneous under the supreme court’s recent ruling in State…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. McArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009