Legal Opinion

Steel City Painting Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1992No. 212 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

This is an appeal by Steel City Painting Company (Employer) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a decision of the referee denying Employer’s petition to modify, terminate or suspend the benefits of Larry Platko (Claimant) under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act).1

Claimant was employed by Employer as an industrial painter/sandblaster when he injured his back in a work-related incident on May 17, 1988. Claimant began to receive benefits under the Act and also began a long course of treatment which failed to produce a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Muse v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Czap v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Joyce Western Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Donton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sears v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Burkey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API