Legal Opinion

Maley v. Heichemer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 25, 1927No. 11,502PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Maley, plaintiff in error and plaintiff in the trial court, brought a replevin action against Heichemer, doing business as City Warehouse Company, defendant, to recover 500 cases of tomatoes. The people of the state of Colorado intervened. Maley obtained possession of the goods under the replevin writ, but disposed of them before the final determination of the case. Judgment was against plaintiff in favor of defendant Heichemer for warehouse charges, and against plaintiff and in favor of intervener, the people, for the value of the goods. Maley prosecutes a writ of error to set aside the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Hoover v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. MarsColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Hemenway & Moser Co. v. FunkUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Heritage Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API