Legal Opinion

Hoover v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1920No. 9577PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Adorns County Court, Hon. W. C. Hood, Jr., Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

This was an information in the name of the People, in the nature of a libel under the initiated statute of November 5, 1918, to declare forfeit certain whisky and the automobile in which it was captured. The facts before this court are agreed on.

The plaintiffs in error, George Hoover and M. H. Richards, were partners operating a garage, automobile livery and taxicab business in Denver. They employed a number of chauffeurs, and owned and used the machine in question in that business. Ethel May Richards, plaintiff in error, and intervenor below, was a bona fide mortgagee of said automobile.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Camp v. RogersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
  3. Aggers v. People ex rel. MontclairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Shawnee Nat. Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Lindsley v. WernerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Heitzman v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Maley v. HeichemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Lindsley v. WernerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API