Legal Opinion

Calaway v. State Bar of California

California Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1986No. L.A. 32090Published

1Opinion of the Court

41 Cal.3d 743 (1986)

716 P.2d 371

225 Cal. Rptr. 267

MARTIN C. CALAWAY, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 32090.

Supreme Court of California.

April 24, 1986.

COUNSEL

Robert M. Newell and Newell & Chester for Petitioner.

Herbert M. Rosenthal, Truitt A. Richey, Jr., Richard J. Zanassi, Arthur Margolis and Caryn Espo for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.[*]

This is a proceeding to review an order of the Review Department of the State Bar Court declining to reinstate petitioner in the practice of law.

Petitioner was admitted to practice in 1956. In 1974, he was convicted in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. CalawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. In Re PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tardiff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Feinstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Roth v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API