Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pappert v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 1, 2005PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
The Commonwealth, through its Attorney General, has filed a Complaint against numerous pharmaceutical companies asserting generally that the companies have engaged in unfair and deceptive marketing schemes and conspiracies that have resulted in overcharging Pennsylvania consumers for the companies’ products. In response, the companies have filed the preliminary objections we now consider. For the reasons stated below, we sustain the Defendants’ preliminary objection asserting that the Complaint fails to plead facts with the specificity required under Pa.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Balletta v. SpadoniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pappert v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Doe v. HeskethDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Pennsylvania Department of Banking v. NCAS of Delaware, LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.