Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pappert v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 3, 2005PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
The Plaintiff, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, through its Attorney General, has a filed a Corrected Amended Complaint 1 on behalf of the Commonwealth, and in its asserted status of parens patri-ae, on behalf of citizens of Pennsylvania, who, according to the Amended Complaint, the Defendants have injured through allegedly improper conduct that has caused entities of the Commonwealth and some of its citizens to pay inflated prices for certain pharmaceuticals the Defendants manufacture, market, and sell.
Before the Court are the Defendants’ preliminary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Baker v. FAMILY CREDIT COUNSELING COPR.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Guy M. Cooper, Inc. v. East Penn School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Global Ground Support, LLC v. Glazer Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Zafarana v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.