Legal Opinion

Webb v. Hunt

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided October 26, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the United States Court from the Northern District. W. M. Sprinser, Judge. Suit by Joseph Hunt against John B. Webb, Decree for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The report of the master in this case sufficiently pre - sents the facts of the case, and the defendant’s exceptions to the findings of the master present the questions of law upon those findings, submitted to the court.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the United States Court from the Northern District. W. M. Sprinser, Judge. Suit by Joseph Hunt against John B. Webb, Decree for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The report of the master in this case sufficiently pre - sents the facts of the case, and the defendant’s exceptions to the findings of the master present the questions of law upon those findings, submitted to the court. The report and exceptions are as follows, to-wit: “(1) That the plaintiff is a citizen of the Cherokee Nation, and the defendant á citizen of the United States, and that both parties reside and may be found…

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

The appellant here (defendant below) has filed 14 specifications of error. The first eleven are to the overruling of the 11 exceptions of the appellant to the master’s report, and the other three are as follows: “(12) In ordering a sale of the hay press, and that the proceeds of said sale be paid to the plaintiff on his claim of $325. (13) In taxing the master’s fee and the fees of officers and witnesses against appellant. (14) In rendering judgment against the defendant for any balance that might be unsatisfied on his claim, in no case to exceed $133.85.” These specifications of error will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilliam v. McCormackTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ellenbogen v. GriffeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Wilhelmi v. LeonardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  4. Marr v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  5. Ritter v. CostIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrill v. WeerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Vandever Invest. Co., Inc. v. HE Leonhardt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. Hill v. LaneCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API