Legal Opinion

In re Gist

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 30, 1998No. 04-98-00454-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

In this original proceeding, the relator, Patricia Gist (“Gist”), seeks mandamus relief from a trial court order that requires her to verify her responses to requests for production. The real party in interest, Baptist Health System (“BHS”), acknowledges that rule 167 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure does not require responses to requests for production to be verified. However, BHS contends that the trial court had the inherent power to impose the verification requirement. BHS relies on case law permitting a trial court to impose sanctions for discovery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hanley v. Hanley, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. Dominguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  5. Guzman v. CarnevaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. in Re State of Texas Ex Rel. Brian Risinger, RelatorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. in Re State of Texas Ex Rel. Brian Risinger, RelatorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. in Re: VERP Investment, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API