Legal Opinion
STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DALE ALLEN SEVERANCE
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 2014No. SD33020PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.
This appeal concerns whether the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“the IAD”) required the dismissal of the criminal case pending against Dale Allen Severance (“Defendant”). See section 217.490 et seq. 1 Because Defendant did not materially comply with the requirements of the IAD— and the State did not waive those requirements — we answer that question in the negative and affirm Defendant’s felony convictions for driving while intoxicated (“DWI”) and driving while license revoked (“DWLR”). See sections 577.010 and 302.321.
Applicable Principles of Review and Governing Law
Whether the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Saxton v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. GalvanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. VinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- STATE OF MISSOURI v. KEITH A. MASHMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Steven Wishom, Relator v. The Honorable Paula P. BryantSupreme Court of Missouri · 2023