Legal Opinion
Lipscomb v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. Lipscomb
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1951No. 13441_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH C. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Brought to recover $3301.20, the difference between the pay of the position he was assigned to on his return from the service and the one he claims he was entitled to have been placed on, this is another in the long catalogue of suits which have been brought in vindication of the rights accorded returned veterans by the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended. 1
The claim in substance was: that on his re-employment by the defendant in February, 1946, after a leave of absence on military service since October, 1943, he should have been assigned to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hewitt v. System Federation No. 152 of Ry. Employees' Dept. of American Federation of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Landsborough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Special Service Co. v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Addison v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Sularz v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956
- Donald I. Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Wilfred L. Beck, Jr. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Guy H. McClearn Jr. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Tilton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962