Legal Opinion

Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1962No. Nos. 16814-16816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.

These are separate actions instituted under § 9 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, as amended, *87150 U.S.C.Appendix § 459.1 The three plaintiffs, employees of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, were each promptly reinstated in railroad employment following satisfactory completion of a period of military service. By these suits, however, the plaintiffs, represented by government counsel as authorized by § 9(d) of the Act, now seek to compel the railroad to grant them the higher seniority which they allegedly would have attained had military service not…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. McKinney v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Aeronautical Industrial District Lodge 727 v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donald I. Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Wilfred L. Beck, Jr. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Guy H. McClearn Jr. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API