Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Falk

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 19, 2025No. 2:23-cv-10488Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LARRY RICHARDSON, Case No. 2:23-cv-10488 Plaintiff, Susan K. DeClercq United States District Judge v. Patricia T. Morris NATHAN FALK, United States Magistrate Judge Defendant. / ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL OR THE UNDERSIGNED’S RECUSAL AND DISQUALIFICATION (ECF No. 51) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO HOLD RESPONSE IN ABEYANCE (ECF No. 56) AS MOOT AND STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S FILING DOCKETED AS ENTRY No. 50 I. Introduction This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Virgil Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Department of Corrections, Kenneth McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. David W. Lanier v. Ed BryantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Linnell Richmond v. Darren SettlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API