Legal Opinion

Linnell Richmond v. Darren Settles

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 2, 2011No. 09-6285UnpublishedCited by 287 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.

Linnell Richmond, an inmate in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Corrections, filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging claims for excessive use of force and unconstitutional confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Darren Settles, Roger Duncan, Janice Sexton, Roscoe Byrd, Amanda Dagley, Jonathan Redmon, and Frank Conlon (“Appellees”).

The same day he filed his complaint, Richmond filed a motion for appointment of counsel because of his inability to afford counsel, his limited access to a law library, and his…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by287 opinions

  1. Joseph Johnson v. Clair SootsmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  2. Vick v. Core CivicDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  3. Amaro v. KirkDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
  4. Adkins v. DennyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
  5. Alexander Harvey-Ogentho v. Deputy WalterDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026

282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API