Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Harter Concrete Products, Inc. v. Buckner & Moore, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 14, 1980No. CIV-78-01108-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
The Third Party Defendant herein asserts that an oral settlement agreement was reached herein with the Plaintiff when Plaintiff offered to settle this controversy for $25,000.00 to be paid by Third Party Defendant, which offer the Third Party Defendant accepted. The Third Party Defendant has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment Specifically Enforcing (this) Settlement Contract. The Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs join the Third Party Defendant in said Motion. In response to said Motion, Plaintiff denies the existence of a settlement agreement herein and requests…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Carl M. Pearson v. Harry A. Skydell and Arnold Dutchen v. Ecological Science Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Cia Anon Venezolana De Navegacion v. Frank L. Harris and Pate Stevedoring Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Cummins Diesel Michigan, Inc. v. The FalconCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Mungin v. Calmar Steamship CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Musifilm, B v. v. SpectorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Capek v. MendelsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Huennekens v. Trash Management Services, Inc. (In Re Or-Grow, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- Larry McCall Cross-Appellant v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Larry McCall Cross-Appellant v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985