Larry McCall Cross-Appellant v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1DissentSwygert, Senior Circuit Judge
The court today limits the authority of the district courts of this circuit to enforce settlement agreements terminating litigation pending before them. Henceforth, a district court will retain jurisdiction to enforce such agreements only if the court succeeds in evidencing an intention to retain jurisdiction. Concluding that the district court did, “if barely,” retain jurisdiction over this case, the court proceeds to reach the merits and reverses the district court’s explicit finding that the defendants, and not the plaintiff, violated the settlement agreement. I dissent. Because it is…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Michael Hanrahan v. Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Gene M. Oswalt Et Vir v. Scripto, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Tokai-Seiki Kk, a Japanese Corporation, Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.