Legal Opinion

Vale v. Union Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1979No. Civ. 43594PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRUNN, J. *

Union Bank (hereafter bank) appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiffs $7,779 damages for breach of contract. Plaintiffs cross-appeal from the judgment insofar as it fails to award them exemplary damages. On the bank’s appeal, we affirm. On the cross-appeal we reverse and remand.

I

The Bank’s Appeal

The plaintiff law firm is a professional corporation. Early in 1973 it entered into a written trust agreement with the bank to set up a pension and profit-sharing plan for the firm’s employees. Under the agreement, the bank became trustee and the firm’s board of directors appointed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Schoenholtz v. DonigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API