Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1966PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
Plaintiff purchased a box of nails from a lumber and hardware supply company, defendants Macrose Lumber & Trim Co., Inc., or Macrose Industries, Inc. (Macrose) which by stipulation are to be treated as one entity. He was injured as a result of the alleged shattering of the very first nail used by him and he brings this action to recover damages for those injuries. The nails were manufactured by Amagasald Nail Works, Ltd., Amagasald, Hyogo, Japan (not a party .to this action) and sold by it to defendant Nissho American Corp. (Nissho American) which in turn resold them to a supplier, Wilmod…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Ruping v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Willson v. . Faxon, Williams FaxonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Katherine Hessler, D.B.A. Dayton Hessler Company v. The Hillwood Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Computerized Radiological Services, Inc. v. Syntex Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Welkener v. Kirkwood Drug Store Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bickram v. Case I.H.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Schwartz v. Macrose Lumber & Trim Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.