Legal Opinion
Coe v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 14, 2009No. 07-35937PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Cathy Mae Coe (“Coe”) appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for social security disability insur-anee benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434, 1381-1383f. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand.1
In July 2004 Coe developed pseudotu-mor cerebri, a syndrome associated with elevated intracranial pressure, and began to experience progressive and rapid vision loss. In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Raymond CORRAO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alcantara v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021