Legal Opinion
Alcantara v. Saul
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 23, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01098Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSEL A.1, Case No.: 20cv1098-MSB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION FOR 13 v. JUDICIAL REVIEW [ECF NO. 16] 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 On June 17, 2020, Rosel A. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. 19 § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security 20 (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income. (ECF 21 No. 1; Certified Admin. R. (“AR”) 13-31, ECF No. 11.) 22 Now…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.