Legal Opinion
Grant v. Boccia
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 28, 2006No. 24320-6-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Adam and Tami Grant appeal the trial court’s summary dismissal of their negligence suit. They contend the court erred by excluding expert testimony that *178Mr. Grant’s fibromyalgia1 was caused by an automobile accident and by dismissing their suit for lack of causation. We affirm.
Kato, C.J.
*178¶2 On October 23, 1997, Gertrude Boccia collided with Mr. Grant’s vehicle while she was changing lanes. The collision forced Mr. Grant’s vehicle onto the curb. On October 9, 2000, the Grants sued Ms. Boccia, claiming the accident caused Mr. Grant’s fibromyalgia.
¶3 On December 15, 2003, Ms. Boccia moved to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Anderson v. AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Marsh v. ValyouSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Grant v. BocciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Lewis v. Simpson Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.