Legal Opinion

Saif Corp. v. Dunn (In re Comp. of Dunn)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 24, 2019No. A164104PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

*207In this petition for judicial review, we are asked to address whether the Workers' Compensation Board erred in determining that claimant's congenital bone condition in his foot known as "unfused apophysis" was not a "preexisting condition," within the meaning of ORS 656.005(24), to be considered in determining the cause of claimant's inflammatory condition known as "apophysitis." Reviewing the board's order for substantial evidence and legal error, ORS 656.298 ; ORS 183.482(7), (8), we conclude that the board did err, and we therefore reverse and remand the board's order for reconsideration.

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. SpurgeonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Corkum v. Bi-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Murdoch v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Portland Adventist Medical Center v. BuckallewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haas v. Estate of Mark Steven CarterOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Johnston v. Gordon Trucking - Heartland ExpressCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API