Legal Opinion
Mid-Valley Pipeline Co. v. King
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 13, 1969No. 756PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Colonial Pipeline Company v. AgertonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- City of Fort Lauderdale v. ByrdDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Conant v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.