Legal Opinion

Mooney v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 27, 1999No. 1:98CV1850PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.

In a diversity action, the plaintiff, Mary Elizabeth Mooney, has brought a medical malpractice claim against defendants, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (“the Cleveland Clinic”) and Scott Strong, M.D. Mrs. Mooney has also asserted numerous other claims which, as discussed below, are either subsumed by the medical malpractice claim or have no basis in law. Defendants have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, this Court grants the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. # 68).

I. Background

The following facts are agreed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Albert White v. Turfway Park Racing Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baskin v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  2. Jordan v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API