Legal Opinion

Suzan Tantleff Trusts v. Federal Deposit Insurance

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 12, 1996No. Civ. 95-1220 (TFH)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.

In this action, the plaintiffs seek a judicial determination that they are owed additional deposit insurance coverage for trust assets lost when a federally insured bank was placed in receivership. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court will deny the plaintiffs’ motion and grant the defendant’s motion.

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs, trustees and beneficiaries of three trusts, have brought suit against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in its capacity as insurer of the bank in which…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crook v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. In Re Cable Family Trust June 10, 1987New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API