National Labor Relations Board v. Citizen-News Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentDenman, Circuit Judge
A. The majority decides an important federal question in conflict with the decisions of the Supreme Court. It rejects pertinent testimony as not substantial, and substitutes its inferences for equally if not more rational inferences of the Board supporting its findings of “Interference, restraint and coercion”.
The decisions so in conflict are National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, 1937, 303 U.S. 261, 271, 58 S.Ct. 571, 576, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, in which, in holding that continued recognition of a company union would be an obstacle to the exercise of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pueblo Gas & Fuel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.