Legal Opinion

State v. Reinders

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 2004No. 02-1932PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

In his criminal prosecution for possession of a controlled substance, the defendant, Todd Reinders, sought to suppress evidence discovered by the police when officers questioned him and searched him after observing him walking along a city street in the middle of the night. The district court overruled his motion to suppress, and he was subsequently convicted of the drug charge. His conviction was affirmed by the court of appeals and this court granted further review. Upon our review of the record and consideration of the parties’ arguments, we affirm.

I. Background Facts and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. DraytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State Of Iowa Vs. Robert Joseph VanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State of Iowa v. Robert Dale Lowe, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  5. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API