Legal Opinion
Brown v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1972No. 71-2767PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
I. Proceedings Below
In September, 1965, the Hearst Corporation, which publishes the San Francisco Examiner, and the Chronicle Publishing Company, which publishes the San Francisco Chronicle, formed the San Francisco Newspaper Printing Company, Inc. (the Company) to operate certain business aspects of the two dailies and the Sunday Examiner and Chronicle. Until 1965, the Newspaper & Periodical Drivers and Helpers’ Union, Local 921, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America (the Union), dealt with each newspaper individually. In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Albrecht v. Herald Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Company and Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Carnation Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Newspaper and Periodical Drivers & Helpers Union, Local No. 921, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Douglas Brown v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. San Francisco Newspaper Printing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Douglas Brown v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972