Sorrells v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentSoper, Circuit Judge
The opinion of the court announces a rule of law contrary to that stated in its former decision in Newman v. United States (C. C. A.) 299 F. 128, 131, in which it was held that, under certain circumstances, entrapment of a defendant by government officials constitutes a valid defense. In that ease, Judge Woods said: “It is well settled that decoys may be used to entrap criminals, and to present opportunity to one intending or willing to commit crime. But decoys are not permissible to ensnare the innocent and law-abiding into the commission of crime. When the criminal design originates, not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Langford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.