Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sorrells v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1932No. 3168Published

1DissentSoper, Circuit Judge

The opinion of the court announces a rule of law contrary to that stated in its former decision in Newman v. United States (C. C. A.) 299 F. 128, 131, in which it was held that, under certain circumstances, entrapment of a defendant by government officials constitutes a valid defense. In that ease, Judge Woods said: “It is well settled that decoys may be used to entrap criminals, and to present opportunity to one intending or willing to commit crime. But decoys are not permissible to ensnare the innocent and law-abiding into the commission of crime. When the criminal design originates, not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Langford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API