Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Cuomo
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided May 5, 1999No. 1:97CV01249PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BEATY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or In The Aternative For Summary Judgment [Document # 6], and Plaintiffs counter Motion for Summary Judgment [Document # 10]. Plaintiff Raymond A. Ingram (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action in North Carolina Superior Court after his tax refunds were seized pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3720A. The refunds were withheld based on a determination by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) that Plaintiff owed a past due, legally enforceable debt to HUD. Defendant removed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Mary Bailey v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Janet G. Hurst, Plaintiff-Counterclaim v. United States Department of Education, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Thomas v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McNally v. Prison Health ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. DyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Associated Mortgage Bankers, Inc. v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. DyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ronald Glenn DyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012