Legal Opinion

GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Dyer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 2012No. 28A04-1107-MF-404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Ronald Glenn Dyer had an FHA-insured loan that he defaulted on. Dyer and GMAC Mortgage, LLC, attended a settlement conference at which they agreed to proceed with a deed in lieu of foreclosure. After the settlement conference, GMAC drafted a written agreement. The agreement included a provision using language required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that neither GMAC nor HUD would pursue a deficiency judgment against Dyer. Dyer, however, was not happy with this provision because he did not think that it gave him enough protection.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Ingram v. CuomoDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cynthia L. Seleme v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, as successor by merger to Chase Home FinanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. DyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API