Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. OfficeMax, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs (collectively “CarMax”) instituted this action against OfficeMax, Inc. (“OfficeMax”) by filing a Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, seeking a declaratory judgment that the use and/or registration of the CarMax trademarks is not a violation of any rights OfficeMax has pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125(a). CarMax also asserts rights under the common law of unfair competition or infringement. 1 By its Counterclaim, OfficeMax asserts: trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 114 (Count 1); unfair competition pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. v. Pro-Tech Power Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1998
- Hasbro, Inc. v. Clue Computing, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Planet Hollywood (Region IV), Inc. v. Hollywood Casino Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- S Industries, Inc. v. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Fuente Cigar, Ltd. v. Opus OneDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.