Legal Opinion
In Re Protest Against Referendum Petition No. 5
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 13, 1939No. 26811PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an action of the clerk of the city of Oklahoma City disapproving the sufficiency of the signatures presented in a petition to refer an ordinance of the city of Oklahoma City designated as • ordinance No. 4475. This •ordinance permitted the drilling of a certain area in the northeastern section known ■as the northeast extension of the Oklahoma City field between Third street and California avenue. This matter was first considered by this court in State ex rel. Hunzicker v. Pulliam, 168 Okla. 632, 37 P.2d 417, 96 A. L. R. 1294, wherein the court held the referendum…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hunzicker v. PulliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Frantz v. AutrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Westgate Oil Co. v. Refineries Production Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Keaton v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Roper v. Board of Ed., City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Edwards v. Hanna Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Duncan v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Weekly v. STATE EX REL. CRISWELL, CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Ginden v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.