Legal Opinion

Spitz v. Goldome Realty Credit Corp.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1992No. 71860PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Plaintiffs, David and Barbara Spitz, filed a class action complaint against defendant, Goldome Realty Credit Corporation, a subsidiary of a federally chartered savings and loan association, in the circuit court of Cook County. According to their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that the defendant did not notify them in writing of the requirements of the Mortgage Escrow Account Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 17, par. 4901 et seq.). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss in which it maintained that plaintiffs’ complaint failed to state a cause of action, because the Act was preempted by Federal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Presley v. Etowah County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. National Commercial Banking Corp. v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Spitz v. Goldome Realty Credit Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Weatherman v. Gary-Wheaton Bank of Fox Valley, N.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fenning v. Glenfed, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Black v. Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API