Legal Opinion

National Commercial Banking Corp. v. Harris

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1988No. 65402PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

At issue in this appeal is a provision of the Foreign Banking Office Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 17, par. 2701 et seq.) which imposes a nonreciprocal license fee upon foreign banks which “do[] not provide reciprocal licensing authority” to Illinois State or national banks (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 17, par. 2710). The circuit court of Cook County declared section 3 of the Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 17, par. 2710) void and unenforceable on its face for its imposition of the nonreciprocal license fee. The court held that the Act violated Federal statutory law and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stern v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Performance Marketing Ass'n, Inc. v. HamerIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada v. MannaIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Spitz v. Goldome Realty Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Performance Marketing Association, Inc. v. HamerIllinois Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API