Legal Opinion

Black v. Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 2001No. A092156PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.

I. Introduction

In 1994, Charles T. Black 1 and Corinne E. Black (the Blacks), then 68 and 67 years of age respectively, entered into a reverse mortgage with Freedom Investment Fund, Inc. (Freedom Investment), using their home as the basis for the mortgage. In 1998, the Blacks, as trustees for the Charles T. Black and Corinne E. Black Trust Agreement, brought this action against Freedom Investment and a host of other corporations, companies and individuals, alleging that the manner of their marketing of the reverse mortgage violated various state laws. The defendants moved for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Turner Ansley v. Ameriquest Mortgage CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Plascencia v. Lending 1st MortgageDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
  4. Lopez v. World Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Quicken Loans, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API