Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. Walton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchneideR, J.
Appellant is a political subdivision of the state by virtue of R. C. 6101.01, et seq.
The subject matter of the application for tax exemption before the Board of Tax Appeals was a tract of land of approximately 76 acres which the appellant acquired in 1953. No application for exemption of the parcel from the Carroll County tax list was filed until the instant one, which relates solely to the tax year 1968 which coincides with the calendar year.
The governing statute in this case is R. C. 5709.08, which, so far as is relevant to the issue, provides that *241“public property used exclusively for a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Denison University v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Bowers v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Yoes v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. PerkOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State Teachers Retirement Board v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Montgomery County Park District v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Sharon Enterprises, Inc. v. Kenworth of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998